It used to be key analysis of a specific, trademarked method and the theories of its founder, which I bought into for a while at the start of my career. However, his method has not thrived, and Im not sure hes even in the guru business anymore, so Ive stripped out the specifics and made this section into a more anonymous, generic example. Methods such as that are a dime endless weeks of frustration.
This Posture Modification System (PMS) makes claims that won't have a sound scientific basis and cannot be generated with the confidence that this would-be guru makes your kids. For instance, the website advertises that PMS expands the fundamental concepts of physics language that irrelevant to therapy. Worse, its grandiose and melodramatically overconfident.
So, whos noticed an improvement in their pain? I at the rear of founder asking a small group of workshop participants whether his technique was working for any of them.
Less than half the participants raised their hands. The guru, however, ignored the mediocre response and proceeded as though all of us had raised our hands, proving his point. Self-serving cognitive distortions dont get much more obvious.
The big involving PMS is in which a deviation from an erect posture could be corrected by exercising in the plane perpendicular to the deviation. In theory, the body understands that a movement within plane say, flapping the arms up and down cant be done efficiently if you leaning forward or backward. Hence, every flap of the arms tends to stimulate the reflex that pulls you upright.
Its a clever notion, but it's notion, completely not having evidence. And utilizing the principle is not straightforward: to use it, you will need the assistance in the founder himself, perhaps practitioner certified within the technique (and there are hardly any of them). You should invest considerable time, money, and energy and all based on the self-serving say-so associated with the aspiring posture expert.
Im embarrassed to admit that, for several years, I taught a simplified version of PMS to my own customer. I was not always a proficient critical thinker its something Ive learned over the years, in part utilizing experience. Eventually I abandoned PMS being a result of its fussiness and inconsistent results.
Its failure to impress me was one of the several major early causes of my disillusionment with both structuralism and Modality Empires. This mixture of extreme scientific uncertainty and practical challenges is an exceedingly great example of why systems for postural correction are incredibly dubious..