What poor posture is not Upper-Crossed Syndrome (and its ilk) - Smart Back Brace
The best-known example of a trendy type of poor posture is undoubtedly Upper-Crossed Syndrome (UCS). It sounds impressively technical. Named by a Czech doctor and researcher, Vladimir Janda, it could be the apex of clinical storytelling about posture in therapy culture, and the prototypical muscle imbalance theory. No clue about bad posture has ever been both this popular and advanced.
What is it? Just head and shoulders forward, mostly, with several complicated assumptions about its causes and consequences. In UCS, your muscles are like dysfunctional ships rigging: some are weak and loose (inhibited), while others are extremely strong and tight (facilitated). Viewed from the side, you can draw diagonal lines between these groups that cross.
(Theres a Lower-Crossed Syndrome as well, but its much less famous.)
Dr. Janda the pioneer. He did good work while using the information he had at the instant. But he was probably mostly wrong about UCS.5 The rest of the article substantiates this.
The crosses for this upper & lower crossed syndromes.
Muscle imbalance theories have not done well over getting couple decades. Jason Silvernail, Doctor of Physical Therapy, comments: There is little data to support these ideas it also my knowledge there never has just lately. There is almost no data to support these ideas & to my knowledge there never may be. ~ Jason Silvernail, DPTResearch has relentlessly shown that professionals have trouble agreeing on exactly whats wrong, and the tightness of muscles doesnt seem to eat much to use their strength, or with pain, or really anything that anyone can actually work by way of. If certain muscles were actually weak in everyone exhibiting the specific posture, and those people tended to have certain problems, it would make sense to try to strengthen those muscles specifically.
But they arent, and they dont, that this doesnt. Treating people as if have got UCS with targeted stretching, strengthening, and massage, say doesnt work any better than generally getting more exercise.
Nor is 1 of this surprising given where the science has gone. In general, it has been choosen as clear that the behaviour and condition of individual muscles is mostly trivial compared to the potent role within the central nervous system as the dictator of almost everything about both function and sensation. In short, its not muscle imbalance who makes people slump and hurt its a brain thing, and UCS a great effect instead of a cause or maybe just a fantasy. Actually there probably isn't any UCS pattern within no cross of weak/tight groups of muscles.
There is just a common posture, plus the panoply of human aches and pains that come and go like aurora borealis (most of which still cannot be specifically explained and in all likelihood never will be).
Ultimately, UCS is just a good story Dr. Janda told even without the good reports. It was a nice idea at the time, it can be has become quite useless. So why is this vision of poor posture still so popular? Jason Silvernail again:
Its accessible to a wide array of practitioners. While it involves muscular assessment, everyone from physicians to fitness experts to physical therapists, chiropractors, athletic trainers, massage therapists and strength coaches will use this approach with their sufferers or clients.
Both clinicians (physicians, physical therapists, chiropractors, athletic trainers) and fitness and service professionals (personal trainers, strength coaches, massage therapists). Individuals with rigorous academic education at doctoral or postgraduate level (physicians, physical therapists), having college education (athletic trainers, strength coaches, some trainers) and along with trade school or certification training (personal trainers, massage therapists). Huge numbers of various people many fields is able to use this. Advertising dream. It provides a simple solution to a complex problem that leverages deeply embedded cultural ideas tend to be far extreme than scientific data.
Thats why these crossed syndrome type things make no sense whatsoever but are not going away any time soon.
Individuals will be talking about this brilliant insight further 50-odd years. I wonder if Janda would [facepalm] if he heard how people could not move beyond this idea, and had more fidelity to amounts . product/idea in order to the process he endorsed.
This just what skeptics mean when appropriate that you cannot find any such thing as bad posture and completely are in agreement with the spirit of that position. A big more to poor posture than UCS. Or perhaps I should say theres less for it.